Review of IPv6 Network Administration

Amazon.com just posted my five-star review of IPv6 Network Administration. Wow, this was a great book. I've added it to my Telecommunications recommended reading list. From the review:

"IPv6 Network Administration is an absolutely first-rate technical guide. It is refreshing to read a book that doesn't waste time by assuming the reader has no networking background. IPv6 Network Administration achieves just the right balance between history, theory, and practical application to serve the needs of administrators and interested readers. If you've been waiting for the right resource from which to learn IPv6, this book is it."

The authors maintain a blog to infrequently post IPv6 issues. I plan to give 6to4 a try. The authors discuss 6PE, which I'd like to understand better. They also mention SEcure Neighbor Discovery (SEND) to mitigate link-layer attacks.

Comments

Anonymous said…
Just out of my own curiousity, what are your thoughts about the time frame for widescale migration to IPv6 standards across the board? Obviously IPv6 has a much better design, from a security standpoint, and it's good that there's been a substantial amount of movement in the last decade into bringing the layer 3 protcol standard for the internet up to speed.

Also, in your opinion, might we see layer 4 protocols revamped anytime soon, as we all know UDP was designed for speed, TCP was designed for reliability, but neither were very concerned with security (Random ISN seems like security through obscurity to me, as Zalewski's random attractor analysis of most of the widely deployed PRNGs points out).

Is there going to come a time in the next 5 years where we seriously have to consider overhauling the layer 4 protocols as well? Or are we relying on security enhancements within the underlying protocols to stabalize the lack of security in the higher level ones(and I don't know why I'm even asking this latter question, as it seems like flawed logic to begin with)?
2:04 AM
Anonymous said…
Richard,

Thanks for your review. Looks like we hit the sweet spot for at least one person :-)

The blog is updated a little less frequently than we'd like at the moment, but we're
aiming to improve that soon.

Niall
3:38 AM
Richard Bejtlich said…
I have no clue concerning migration to IPv6. Places where IPv4 addresses are scarce (primarily Asia) are driving IPv6 development. I don't see the same pressures elsewhere.

Why does IPv6 have a better design from a security standpoint? Are you referencing IPSec? If so, we have that now with IPv4. We often hear IPSec is "mandatory" in IPv6, but all that means is IPv6 stacks must support IPSec. I am using IPv6 in my lab now with no IPSec.

There is nothing wrong with building security into lower levels if those enhancements address the confidentiality, integrity, or availability issues that concern us. In fact, security at lower issues may be a better solution.
8:20 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Zeek in Action Videos

Image
This is a quick note to point blog readers to my Zeek in Action YouTube video series for the Zeek network security monitoring project .  Each video addresses a topic that I think might be of interest to people trying to understand their network using Zeek and adjacent tools and approaches, like Suricata, Wireshark, and so on.  I am especially pleased with Video 6 on monitoring wireless networks . It took me several weeks to research material for this video. I had to buy new hardware and experiment with a Linux distro that I had not used before -- Parrot .  Please like and subscribe, and let me know if there is a topic you think might make a good video.
Read more

MITRE ATT&CK Tactics Are Not Tactics

Image
Just what are "tactics"? Introduction MITRE ATT&CK  is a great resource, but something about it has bothered me since I first heard about it several years ago. It's a minor point, but I wanted to document it in case it confuses anyone else. The MITRE ATT&CK Design and Philosophy document from March 2020 says the following: At a high-level, ATT&CK is a behavioral model that consists of the following core components: • Tactics, denoting short-term, tactical adversary goals during an attack; • Techniques, describing the means by which adversaries achieve tactical goals; • Sub-techniques, describing more specific means by which adversaries achieve tactical goals at a lower level than techniques; and • Documented adversary usage of techniques, their procedures, and other metadata. My concern is with MITRE's definition of "tactics" as "short-term, tactical adversary goals during an attack," which is oddly recursive. The key word in the tacti...
Read more

New Book! The Best of TaoSecurity Blog, Volume 4

Image
  I've completed the TaoSecurity Blog book series . The new book is  The Best of TaoSecurity Blog, Volume 4: Beyond the Blog with Articles, Testimony, and Scholarship .  It's available now for Kindle , and I'm working on the print edition.  I'm running a 50% off promo on Volumes 1-3 on Kindle through midnight 20 April. Take advantage before the prices go back up. I described the new title thus: Go beyond TaoSecurity Blog with this new volume from author Richard Bejtlich. In the first three volumes of the series, Mr. Bejtlich selected and republished the very best entries from 18 years of writing and over 18 million blog views, along with commentaries and additional material.  In this title, Mr. Bejtlich collects material that has not been published elsewhere, including articles that are no longer available or are stored in assorted digital or physical archives. Volume 4 offers early white papers that Mr. Bejtlich wrote as a network defender, either for technica...
Read more