SANS Replaces Several Threat References in Top 20

Last week I posted comments about several misuses of the word "threat" in the latest SANS twenty most critical Internet security vulnerabilities. After receiving an email from Alan Paller, I returned to the SANS site and saw many of my recommended changes were made. For example, you can now "Jump To Index of Top 20 Vulnerabilities", instead of "threats." I appreciate SANS taking my suggestions to heart.

Update: It's becoming clear where the confusion regarding "threat" vs "vulnerability" originates for the SANS Top 20. One of you pointed me towards the article Mac OS X Under Scrutiny. See how many misuses of the term threat you can find. Here's a freebie:

"SANS's Dhamankar stressed that the intent was not to call the Mac OS X operating system a threat, but to give Mac users a wake up call."

Comments

Anonymous said…
I definitely agree with your admonishment to use information security vocabulary correctly. I constantly run into marketing at work throwing around "threat" when they shouldn't.

Now if only they would make each vulnerability actually correspond to a single vulnerability (or at least a handful).

For example, they list "N1. Cisco IOS and non-IOS Products" -- isn't that ALL Cisco products. For this one I do concede that they go on to only list a handful of CVE names as examples, but surely they can come up with a better title.

This is more like a bunch of vulnerabilities put into 20 categories. "C10. Other Cross-platform Applications" is much worse. With a title like that, it should logically cover thousands of vulnerabilities.
Anonymous said…
I still remember when they first announced the GSEC certification, it was just the Hacker FAQ word for word, including the typos too, how sad......

Popular posts from this blog

Five Reasons I Want China Running Its Own Software

Cybersecurity Domains Mind Map

A Brief History of the Internet in Northern Virginia