FreeBSD Ports Tree Breaks 13,000 Ports, and Other FreeBSD News

This week the FreeBSD ports tree broke the 13,000 mark. The tree has added about 2000 ports per year for the past four years. This graph shows the number of ports added per year since 1995. Just last six months ago I blogged about passing the 12,000 mark.

For those of you not familiar with the FreeBSD ports tree, it's a set of files and directories bundled with FreeBSD that allows easy software installation from source code. The ports tree is a wrapper of sorts, built by FreeBSD users, that makes any necessary tweaks or modifications needed to get source code to compile and install on FreeBSD. The ports tree also automatically resolves dependencies, and can be kept up-to-date very well. For those not wishing to install from source, packages are available. I almost use packages exclusively on my laptop, for example.

Speaking of the ports tree, there are several notable additions. First is John Curry's SANCP, usually bundled with Sguil. SANCP is a session data probe which can work alone or with Sguil. Thanks to Paul Schmehl for the new port. Expect to see Sguil ports from Paul in the near future.

A second useful new port is Nick Rogness' snort-inline. This is a must for anyone running snort-inline on FreeBSD. It uses snort-2.3.0-RC1.tar.gz, which has support for FreeBSD. My testing shows that code works while later mainline Snort versions do not work properly with FreeBSD. Expect to see full integration of FreeBSD support in future Snort distributions.

Finally from FreeBSD land, we have word of release plans for FreeBSD 6.0. We are told we may see FreeBSD 6.0 RELEASE on 15 August. I would expect to see the new release in early to mid-September, given past form. Here is an important excerpt from Scott Long's post:

"[T]he plan is for 6.0 to be a modest replacement for 5.x. We do plan on a 5.5 release in September to tie up the branch and help people move to 6.0/6.1, but 6.x is truly just a much improved 5.x at this point.

For those with bosses who are fainting at the thought of there being a 7-CURRENT around the corner and 5-STABLE coming to a close, please keep in mind that migrating from 5.x to 6.x is trivial and is worthwhile. However, we need to do the branch now so that we can keep things like SMPVFS under control and produce a high-quality series of releases with it.

For those who have already adopted 5.x and cannot spend the time/money to migrate again, RELENG_5 will still have secteam support into at least 2007 (going by their normal formula), and I expect
there to be normal feature and bug-fix commits to it for at least another year from now."

I've been running FreeBSD 5.x since early 2003, but the 5.x tree only became stable with 5.3 RELEASE last fall. It looks like the 5.x tree is acting like the 3.x tree did between successful 2.x and 4.x versions. Is FreeBSD starting to resemble Star Trek movies?

If you'd like to test the latest 6-CURRENT snapshots, you can download them.

Comments

Anonymous said…
It looks like the 5.x tree is acting like the 3.x tree did between successful 2.x and 4.x versions. Is FreeBSD starting to resemble Star Trek movies?

Actually, I was starting to wonder if you were going to refer to Linux kernel version methodology. :)

-d
11:37 PM
Anonymous said…
If 6 resembles 4, then I won't be looking at DragonFly as hard as I have.
5:18 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Zeek in Action Videos

Image
This is a quick note to point blog readers to my Zeek in Action YouTube video series for the Zeek network security monitoring project .  Each video addresses a topic that I think might be of interest to people trying to understand their network using Zeek and adjacent tools and approaches, like Suricata, Wireshark, and so on.  I am especially pleased with Video 6 on monitoring wireless networks . It took me several weeks to research material for this video. I had to buy new hardware and experiment with a Linux distro that I had not used before -- Parrot .  Please like and subscribe, and let me know if there is a topic you think might make a good video.
Read more

MITRE ATT&CK Tactics Are Not Tactics

Image
Just what are "tactics"? Introduction MITRE ATT&CK  is a great resource, but something about it has bothered me since I first heard about it several years ago. It's a minor point, but I wanted to document it in case it confuses anyone else. The MITRE ATT&CK Design and Philosophy document from March 2020 says the following: At a high-level, ATT&CK is a behavioral model that consists of the following core components: • Tactics, denoting short-term, tactical adversary goals during an attack; • Techniques, describing the means by which adversaries achieve tactical goals; • Sub-techniques, describing more specific means by which adversaries achieve tactical goals at a lower level than techniques; and • Documented adversary usage of techniques, their procedures, and other metadata. My concern is with MITRE's definition of "tactics" as "short-term, tactical adversary goals during an attack," which is oddly recursive. The key word in the tacti
Read more

New Book! The Best of TaoSecurity Blog, Volume 4

Image
  I've completed the TaoSecurity Blog book series . The new book is  The Best of TaoSecurity Blog, Volume 4: Beyond the Blog with Articles, Testimony, and Scholarship .  It's available now for Kindle , and I'm working on the print edition.  I'm running a 50% off promo on Volumes 1-3 on Kindle through midnight 20 April. Take advantage before the prices go back up. I described the new title thus: Go beyond TaoSecurity Blog with this new volume from author Richard Bejtlich. In the first three volumes of the series, Mr. Bejtlich selected and republished the very best entries from 18 years of writing and over 18 million blog views, along with commentaries and additional material.  In this title, Mr. Bejtlich collects material that has not been published elsewhere, including articles that are no longer available or are stored in assorted digital or physical archives. Volume 4 offers early white papers that Mr. Bejtlich wrote as a network defender, either for technical or pol
Read more