Researching Cisco Switch Backplane Statistics

While teaching at USENIX last week, I discussed SPAN ports. I mentioned that copying traffic to the SPAN port was less important than moving packets through the switch. One of the students asked if measuring the utilization of the switch backplane would reveal how well the switch was performing the SPAN function. Another student said there was a Simple Network Management Protocol Management Information Base (SNMP MIB) from which backplane statistics could be retrieved. I decided to research this issue as it affects using switches to collect traffic for network security monitoring. (Incidentally, Talisker offers SPAN port configuration advice for all sorts of switches.)

One answer appears in the Cisco document How to Get Catalyst Switch Backplane Utilization Using SNMP. This sounds promising until we read "the information in this document is valid for Cisco Catalyst switches that run Catalyst code only." Since modern Cisco switches run IOS, we seem out of luck.

That document produced several leads. First, it mentioned the CISCO-STACK-MIB. Finding this MIB clued me in to the multitude of MIBs offered by Cisco. They are available via FTP from ftp://ftp.cisco.com/pub/mibs/.

The link to the CISCO-STACK-MIB brought me to the SNMP Object Navigator. This is a really helpful tool. You can search object names and descriptions to receive a list of matching objects and MIBs for terms like backplane.

Another excellent resource is the MIBs Supported by Product tool. For example, here are all of the MIBs supported by the Cisco 2950 switch.

Cisco offers a few other helpful sites. These include the Cisco IOS MIB Tools page. That site has a link labelled MIB Locator. Follow it, select your IOS release, platform family (device), and IOS feature set, and you will learn what MIBs are present. Also useful are SNMP: Frequently Asked Questions About MIBs and the IP Application Services page for SNMP.

Getting back to the original question -- the original Cat OS discussion of the CISCO-STACK-MIB mentioned the sysTraffic Object Name as a place to find backplane information. Specifically, the description reads "Traffic meter value, i.e. the percentage of bandwidth utilization for the previous polling interval." The question now is to find out what Cisco devices support providing this information via SNMP. The View Supporting Images link on the sysTraffic page shows the Cisco IOS images which offer this SNMP value.

According to the results, the Cisco 3550 appears to be the cheapest switch which provides backplane statistics. I guess I won't be able to test this on my 2950! If anyone else managed to try this out, perhaps using snmpwalk from Net-SNMP, please post a comment.

Comments

Anonymous said…
If you are going to be playing around with snmp and mibs I have found scotty http://www.freshports.org/net-mgmt/scotty3/ to be very handy. And it is a tcl exension.

marc
10:50 AM
Richard Bejtlich said…
ACK, thank you.
4:42 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Zeek in Action Videos

Image
This is a quick note to point blog readers to my Zeek in Action YouTube video series for the Zeek network security monitoring project .  Each video addresses a topic that I think might be of interest to people trying to understand their network using Zeek and adjacent tools and approaches, like Suricata, Wireshark, and so on.  I am especially pleased with Video 6 on monitoring wireless networks . It took me several weeks to research material for this video. I had to buy new hardware and experiment with a Linux distro that I had not used before -- Parrot .  Please like and subscribe, and let me know if there is a topic you think might make a good video.
Read more

MITRE ATT&CK Tactics Are Not Tactics

Image
Just what are "tactics"? Introduction MITRE ATT&CK  is a great resource, but something about it has bothered me since I first heard about it several years ago. It's a minor point, but I wanted to document it in case it confuses anyone else. The MITRE ATT&CK Design and Philosophy document from March 2020 says the following: At a high-level, ATT&CK is a behavioral model that consists of the following core components: • Tactics, denoting short-term, tactical adversary goals during an attack; • Techniques, describing the means by which adversaries achieve tactical goals; • Sub-techniques, describing more specific means by which adversaries achieve tactical goals at a lower level than techniques; and • Documented adversary usage of techniques, their procedures, and other metadata. My concern is with MITRE's definition of "tactics" as "short-term, tactical adversary goals during an attack," which is oddly recursive. The key word in the tacti
Read more

New Book! The Best of TaoSecurity Blog, Volume 4

Image
  I've completed the TaoSecurity Blog book series . The new book is  The Best of TaoSecurity Blog, Volume 4: Beyond the Blog with Articles, Testimony, and Scholarship .  It's available now for Kindle , and I'm working on the print edition.  I'm running a 50% off promo on Volumes 1-3 on Kindle through midnight 20 April. Take advantage before the prices go back up. I described the new title thus: Go beyond TaoSecurity Blog with this new volume from author Richard Bejtlich. In the first three volumes of the series, Mr. Bejtlich selected and republished the very best entries from 18 years of writing and over 18 million blog views, along with commentaries and additional material.  In this title, Mr. Bejtlich collects material that has not been published elsewhere, including articles that are no longer available or are stored in assorted digital or physical archives. Volume 4 offers early white papers that Mr. Bejtlich wrote as a network defender, either for technical or pol
Read more