BPF for IP or VLAN Traffic

Four years ago I did a second post on Understanding Tcpdump's -d Option, showing how you can using the -d option to understand how Berkeley Packet Filter syntax works.

Recently my colleagues and I encountered a problem where we were monitoring traffic on a tap, but the traffic contained traffic with and without 802.1q VLAN tags. We wanted to create a BPF that would catch traffic whether or not it had VLAN tags. It turns out there is a difference between these two BPFs:

ip or vlan

is not the same as

vlan or ip

The first accomplishes our goal, but the second does not.

To understand why, I used Tcpdump's -d option.

$ tcpdump -d  -n -r sample.pcap ip or vlan
reading from file sample.pcap, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet)
(000) ldh      [12]
(001) jeq      #0x800           jt 3    jf 2
(002) jeq      #0x8100          jt 3    jf 4
(003) ret      #65535
(004) ret      #0

That looks right. Load the half word at offset 12. If it's the IP Ethertype, you get the whole packet. If it's not IP, go to the next instruction. If it's a 802.1Q VLAN tag, again you get the whole packet. Otherwise, return nothing.

This is the other option.

$ tcpdump -d  -n -r sample.pcap vlan or ip
reading from file sample.pcap, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet)
(000) ldh      [12]
(001) jeq      #0x8100          jt 4    jf 2
(002) ldh      [16]
(003) jeq      #0x800           jt 4    jf 5
(004) ret      #65535
(005) ret      #0

That doesn't work. Load the half word at offset 12. If it's a 802.1Q VLAN tag, you get the whole packet. If it's not a 802.1Q VLAN tag, load the half word at offset 16. If that half word is an IP Ethertype (which it won't be), you get the whole packet. Otherwise, return nothing.

For an example of how you would combine a host and port filter with this syntax, see the following:

tcpdump -n -r ip.pcap \(ip and host 1.2.3.4 and port 80\) or \(vlan and host 1.2.3.4 and port 80\)

You might see this new option appear in Sguil CVS soon.

Richard Bejtlich is teaching new classes in DC and Europe in 2009. Register by 1 Jan and 1 Feb, respectively, for the best rates.

Comments

JaBbA said…
But why does tcpdump insert the ldh [16] command? There's no explanation of the mechanism that causes that to happen - how can we avoid problems like this?
8:58 AM
Anonymous said…
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
2:14 AM
John Thacker said…
"But why does tcpdump insert the ldh [16] command? "

If you read the tcpdump man page, you'll see that any vlan primitive changes all offsets by 4 bytes to account for the vlan tag. This makes future offsets work correctly, including multiple vlans.

However, it only really makes sense with "and" not with "or."

vlan 2 or vlan 4

Doesn't match if the first vlan tag is 2 or if the first vlan tag is 4. What it actually matches is if the first vlan tag is 2.... or if a second (nested, offset by 4) vlan tag is 4. Counterintuitive.
5:02 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Zeek in Action Videos

Image
This is a quick note to point blog readers to my Zeek in Action YouTube video series for the Zeek network security monitoring project .  Each video addresses a topic that I think might be of interest to people trying to understand their network using Zeek and adjacent tools and approaches, like Suricata, Wireshark, and so on.  I am especially pleased with Video 6 on monitoring wireless networks . It took me several weeks to research material for this video. I had to buy new hardware and experiment with a Linux distro that I had not used before -- Parrot .  Please like and subscribe, and let me know if there is a topic you think might make a good video.
Read more

MITRE ATT&CK Tactics Are Not Tactics

Image
Just what are "tactics"? Introduction MITRE ATT&CK  is a great resource, but something about it has bothered me since I first heard about it several years ago. It's a minor point, but I wanted to document it in case it confuses anyone else. The MITRE ATT&CK Design and Philosophy document from March 2020 says the following: At a high-level, ATT&CK is a behavioral model that consists of the following core components: • Tactics, denoting short-term, tactical adversary goals during an attack; • Techniques, describing the means by which adversaries achieve tactical goals; • Sub-techniques, describing more specific means by which adversaries achieve tactical goals at a lower level than techniques; and • Documented adversary usage of techniques, their procedures, and other metadata. My concern is with MITRE's definition of "tactics" as "short-term, tactical adversary goals during an attack," which is oddly recursive. The key word in the tacti...
Read more

New Book! The Best of TaoSecurity Blog, Volume 4

Image
  I've completed the TaoSecurity Blog book series . The new book is  The Best of TaoSecurity Blog, Volume 4: Beyond the Blog with Articles, Testimony, and Scholarship .  It's available now for Kindle , and I'm working on the print edition.  I'm running a 50% off promo on Volumes 1-3 on Kindle through midnight 20 April. Take advantage before the prices go back up. I described the new title thus: Go beyond TaoSecurity Blog with this new volume from author Richard Bejtlich. In the first three volumes of the series, Mr. Bejtlich selected and republished the very best entries from 18 years of writing and over 18 million blog views, along with commentaries and additional material.  In this title, Mr. Bejtlich collects material that has not been published elsewhere, including articles that are no longer available or are stored in assorted digital or physical archives. Volume 4 offers early white papers that Mr. Bejtlich wrote as a network defender, either for technica...
Read more