Recycling Security Technology

Remember when IDS was supposed to be dead? I thought it was funny to see the very same inspection technologies that concentrated on inbound traffic suddenly turned around to watch outbound traffic. Never mind that the so-called "IPS" that rendered the "IDS" dead used the same technology. Now, thanks to VMware VMsafe APIs, vendors looking for something else to do with their packet inspection code can watch traffic between VMs, as reported by the hypervisor.

We've seen Solera, Altor, and others jump into this space. It's popular and helpful to wonder if having the ability to monitor traffic on the ESX server is a feature or product. I consider it a feature. The very same code that can be found in products from Sourcefire and other established players is likely to be much more robust than something a startup is going to assemble, assuming the startup isn't using Snort anyway! Once the traditional plug-into-the-wire vendors hear of this requirement from their customers, they will acquire or more likely squash any "pure virtualization" bit players. Traffic collected via VMsafe will just be another packet feed.

Although I am a big fan of visibility, it seems a little disheartening to think we must resort to adding a packet inspection product to VMware in order to determine if the VMs are behaving -- never mind the fact that the hypervisor itself could be compromised and omitting traffic sent to the VM-based network inspection product. Sigh.

Comments

Christofer Hoff said…
Rich, just a couple of points:

1) Most of the start-up's you're seeing entering this space in the form of virtual appliances are gap fillers because VMsafe was not available (and isn't yet released in production form via a VMware release)

It's somewhat of a level playing field now (only to be leveled again) as everyone is constrained by the limits of the virtual networking configuration.

2) If you look at the players who have signed up to develop against the API, a majority of them *are* the big players, so you're right about the "traditional" players flexing their muscles...soon.

3) VMsafe does a little more than simply add "packet inspection" to the platform. Although the hooks are a little coarse on the first release, VMsafe provides some very interesting capabilities that trigger on memory, disk, I/O and network...

Unfortunately, VMsafe also only allows redirection of traffic for inspection/disposition to a VA/VM within the ESX server, so you can't send traffic out externally to a dedicated appliance which leads to:

4) The traditional and startups in this space are going to run into some nasty scaling and resiliency issues as they try to scale their products as a virtual appliance within the same host competing to service resource requests for production VM's...we have a hard-enough time getting good scaling and performance from dedicated appliances.

This is actually one of the topics of my Blackhat preso. this year. You can get a taste for what I mean here:

http://rationalsecurity.typepad.com/blog/2008/04/the-four-horsem.html

Great post.

/Hoff
11:08 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Zeek in Action Videos

Image
This is a quick note to point blog readers to my Zeek in Action YouTube video series for the Zeek network security monitoring project .  Each video addresses a topic that I think might be of interest to people trying to understand their network using Zeek and adjacent tools and approaches, like Suricata, Wireshark, and so on.  I am especially pleased with Video 6 on monitoring wireless networks . It took me several weeks to research material for this video. I had to buy new hardware and experiment with a Linux distro that I had not used before -- Parrot .  Please like and subscribe, and let me know if there is a topic you think might make a good video.
Read more

MITRE ATT&CK Tactics Are Not Tactics

Image
Just what are "tactics"? Introduction MITRE ATT&CK  is a great resource, but something about it has bothered me since I first heard about it several years ago. It's a minor point, but I wanted to document it in case it confuses anyone else. The MITRE ATT&CK Design and Philosophy document from March 2020 says the following: At a high-level, ATT&CK is a behavioral model that consists of the following core components: • Tactics, denoting short-term, tactical adversary goals during an attack; • Techniques, describing the means by which adversaries achieve tactical goals; • Sub-techniques, describing more specific means by which adversaries achieve tactical goals at a lower level than techniques; and • Documented adversary usage of techniques, their procedures, and other metadata. My concern is with MITRE's definition of "tactics" as "short-term, tactical adversary goals during an attack," which is oddly recursive. The key word in the tacti
Read more

New Book! The Best of TaoSecurity Blog, Volume 4

Image
  I've completed the TaoSecurity Blog book series . The new book is  The Best of TaoSecurity Blog, Volume 4: Beyond the Blog with Articles, Testimony, and Scholarship .  It's available now for Kindle , and I'm working on the print edition.  I'm running a 50% off promo on Volumes 1-3 on Kindle through midnight 20 April. Take advantage before the prices go back up. I described the new title thus: Go beyond TaoSecurity Blog with this new volume from author Richard Bejtlich. In the first three volumes of the series, Mr. Bejtlich selected and republished the very best entries from 18 years of writing and over 18 million blog views, along with commentaries and additional material.  In this title, Mr. Bejtlich collects material that has not been published elsewhere, including articles that are no longer available or are stored in assorted digital or physical archives. Volume 4 offers early white papers that Mr. Bejtlich wrote as a network defender, either for technical or pol
Read more