A Hacker in Charge of Your Tax Dollars?

I read Hacker 'Mudge' gets DARPA job by Elinor Mills:

Peiter Zatko--a respected hacker known as "Mudge"--has been tapped to be a program manager at DARPA, where he will be in charge of funding research designed to help give the U.S. government tools needed to protect against cyberattacks, CNET has learned.

Zatko will become a program manager in mid-March within the Strategic Technologies Office at DARPA (Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency), which is the research and development office for the Department of Defense. His focus will be cybersecurity...

Another lure of the job was the budget he will have. Zatko said he doesn't know exactly how much of the $3.5 billion a year DARPA spends to fund research he will oversee but said it's likely to be a "good chunk."

A hacker in charge of your tax dollars? I think that's... great! I'm pleased to see someone with the right mindset and experience making decisions on next-generation digital security projects. I am pretty sure no one with a lame research proposal or dumb idea for a start-up is going to be able to fool Mudge. This is another watershed event for our community, similar to Jeff Moss being selected to an advisory position in DHS.

It's important to place this event in context. The cover at the top shows "Maximum Security," one of the first technical books on digital security to be published. ("Practical Unix and Information Security" was my introduction.) The year was 1997, and the Anonymous author chose not to reveal his identity for fear of the consequences. Think about that for a moment. Now, 13 years later, we have a real hacker -- a real hacker, not an intruder -- supervising the budget of a government agency. That's amazing progress. Congratulations Mudge!

PS: One minor point. The author writes:

Zatko cut his security chops as a teen-age hacker in the 1980s and managed to stay one step ahead of the law.

I have a feeling the author added this line to "spice up" the article, thinking that "hackers" need to have run-ins, or need to avoid run-ins, with the law in order to have "street cred." In all the years I have known of Mudge (I met him in the fall of 1998 when he taught a class with Mike Schiffman at the AFIWC), I never thought of him as a criminal or a "near-criminal." He's always been a security researcher as far as I am concerned.

Comments

Andrew Jaquith said…
Well said, Richard.
1:33 AM
Paul Hite said…
Very exciting! I agree Mudge will do much better than the usual suits in this post.
10:14 AM
noneck said…
I'm am very excited to read this. This is good news.
6:10 PM
Anonymous said…
Brilliant! Finally someone with a brain in charge.
4:07 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Zeek in Action Videos

Image
This is a quick note to point blog readers to my Zeek in Action YouTube video series for the Zeek network security monitoring project .  Each video addresses a topic that I think might be of interest to people trying to understand their network using Zeek and adjacent tools and approaches, like Suricata, Wireshark, and so on.  I am especially pleased with Video 6 on monitoring wireless networks . It took me several weeks to research material for this video. I had to buy new hardware and experiment with a Linux distro that I had not used before -- Parrot .  Please like and subscribe, and let me know if there is a topic you think might make a good video.
Read more

MITRE ATT&CK Tactics Are Not Tactics

Image
Just what are "tactics"? Introduction MITRE ATT&CK  is a great resource, but something about it has bothered me since I first heard about it several years ago. It's a minor point, but I wanted to document it in case it confuses anyone else. The MITRE ATT&CK Design and Philosophy document from March 2020 says the following: At a high-level, ATT&CK is a behavioral model that consists of the following core components: • Tactics, denoting short-term, tactical adversary goals during an attack; • Techniques, describing the means by which adversaries achieve tactical goals; • Sub-techniques, describing more specific means by which adversaries achieve tactical goals at a lower level than techniques; and • Documented adversary usage of techniques, their procedures, and other metadata. My concern is with MITRE's definition of "tactics" as "short-term, tactical adversary goals during an attack," which is oddly recursive. The key word in the tacti...
Read more

New Book! The Best of TaoSecurity Blog, Volume 4

Image
  I've completed the TaoSecurity Blog book series . The new book is  The Best of TaoSecurity Blog, Volume 4: Beyond the Blog with Articles, Testimony, and Scholarship .  It's available now for Kindle , and I'm working on the print edition.  I'm running a 50% off promo on Volumes 1-3 on Kindle through midnight 20 April. Take advantage before the prices go back up. I described the new title thus: Go beyond TaoSecurity Blog with this new volume from author Richard Bejtlich. In the first three volumes of the series, Mr. Bejtlich selected and republished the very best entries from 18 years of writing and over 18 million blog views, along with commentaries and additional material.  In this title, Mr. Bejtlich collects material that has not been published elsewhere, including articles that are no longer available or are stored in assorted digital or physical archives. Volume 4 offers early white papers that Mr. Bejtlich wrote as a network defender, either for technica...
Read more