Chinese Counterintelligence Doesn't Fool Around

Screen capture from 2 Jan 2015 SCMP
This is an amazing story in the South China Morning Post.

Typist sentenced to death in China for leaking military secrets

Worker said to have sold secrets about centre researching secret weapon to an unnamed foreign intelligence agency

A young typist who worked at a Chinese military manufacturer’s research centre that was developing a secret weapons system has been sentenced to death for spying for a foreign intelligence agency, according to a state-run media report.

 Yu Hongyang, a member of staff at an unnamed research office, was said to have damaged national security by leaking state secrets, the news website of the Global Times newspaper reported.

 He was caught by the Ministry of State Security for allegedly buying secret information and then selling it in an “extremely severe” case that warranted the death penalty, the report said.

 The foreign intelligence agency allegedly involved was not named.

 Yu was employed at the centre on its secretarial staff.

 The facility was involved in researching “a secret weapon that could vanquish the enemy in future battles”, the report said.

 Yu wanted more cash so started looking for other work.

 “His greed for money led him to post an online job search,” the report said.

 He was then contacted by a foreign intelligence agency posing as potential employer.

 Yu revealed basic information about the military research office during initial meetings with foreign intelligence staff, the report said.

 The foreign agency gave him cash and gifts and later asked him to give more detailed information about the site’s research work.

 “Despite that fact that Yu had been well briefed on secrecy, he caved in due to his intense materialism,” the newspaper commented.

 The report said that although Yu was a typist he was still able to get his hands on critical information that “trashed decades of research efforts on national security”.

 He was said to have stolen large quantities of highly confidential state secrets.

So, "enquiring minds want to know..."

  • Who bought the secrets?
  • What are the secrets? What is this super weapon?
  • Is it original, or stolen?
  • How often do the Chinese execute spies?
  • Why did the story become public -- as a warning?
Some of the comments are almost as interesting as the original story.

Sifu_628 Jan 3rd 2015 
8:38pm

Why would not a common man sell out, when the overwhelming majority of CCPC members are corrupt and are engaging in similar activities. Families of corrupt officials are living and studying Overseas and are spying for foreign intelligence agencies in exchange for money laundering services and protection from legal prosecution. This typist has been singled out, bad luck!

Beaker Jan 3rd 2015 12:41am

So, re-interpreted, un-named Chinese research institute is embarrassed by leaks showing what technologies they have been hacking from Boeing and Locheed Martin. Guy seems to be a money grubber with no principals. Death is OK.

I'm guessing this "Beaker" isn't Chris Hoff -- I doubt he would say "principals" instead of "principles."

Thanks to Mihoko Matsubara for inspiring this post.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Zeek in Action Videos

Image
This is a quick note to point blog readers to my Zeek in Action YouTube video series for the Zeek network security monitoring project .  Each video addresses a topic that I think might be of interest to people trying to understand their network using Zeek and adjacent tools and approaches, like Suricata, Wireshark, and so on.  I am especially pleased with Video 6 on monitoring wireless networks . It took me several weeks to research material for this video. I had to buy new hardware and experiment with a Linux distro that I had not used before -- Parrot .  Please like and subscribe, and let me know if there is a topic you think might make a good video.
Read more

MITRE ATT&CK Tactics Are Not Tactics

Image
Just what are "tactics"? Introduction MITRE ATT&CK  is a great resource, but something about it has bothered me since I first heard about it several years ago. It's a minor point, but I wanted to document it in case it confuses anyone else. The MITRE ATT&CK Design and Philosophy document from March 2020 says the following: At a high-level, ATT&CK is a behavioral model that consists of the following core components: • Tactics, denoting short-term, tactical adversary goals during an attack; • Techniques, describing the means by which adversaries achieve tactical goals; • Sub-techniques, describing more specific means by which adversaries achieve tactical goals at a lower level than techniques; and • Documented adversary usage of techniques, their procedures, and other metadata. My concern is with MITRE's definition of "tactics" as "short-term, tactical adversary goals during an attack," which is oddly recursive. The key word in the tacti
Read more

New Book! The Best of TaoSecurity Blog, Volume 4

Image
  I've completed the TaoSecurity Blog book series . The new book is  The Best of TaoSecurity Blog, Volume 4: Beyond the Blog with Articles, Testimony, and Scholarship .  It's available now for Kindle , and I'm working on the print edition.  I'm running a 50% off promo on Volumes 1-3 on Kindle through midnight 20 April. Take advantage before the prices go back up. I described the new title thus: Go beyond TaoSecurity Blog with this new volume from author Richard Bejtlich. In the first three volumes of the series, Mr. Bejtlich selected and republished the very best entries from 18 years of writing and over 18 million blog views, along with commentaries and additional material.  In this title, Mr. Bejtlich collects material that has not been published elsewhere, including articles that are no longer available or are stored in assorted digital or physical archives. Volume 4 offers early white papers that Mr. Bejtlich wrote as a network defender, either for technical or pol
Read more