Musings on Microsoft's Bad Week

By now everyone knows about Microsoft code being "made available on the Internet", according to the linked press release. Microsoft claims:

"On Thursday, February 12, Microsoft became aware that portions of the Microsoft Windows 2000 and Windows NT 4.0 source code were illegally made available on the Internet. Subsequent investigation has shown this was not the result of any breach of Microsoft?s corporate network or internal security, nor is it related to Microsoft?s Shared Source Initiative or its Government Security Program."

This probably doesn't comfort Mainsoft, claimed by some to be involved in the leak.

I found it amusing that news outfits like NPR and Wired and CNN found the amount of profanity in the Windows source to be newsworthy. A Slashdot post provided the following help grep syntax:

grep -Hirn "INSERT PROFANITY HERE" ./*

In case you're wondering about the switches:

       -H, --with-filename
       -i, --ignore-case
       -r, --recursive
       -n, --line-number

The Slashdot follow-up is probably the best place for a comprehensive look at the issue.

The silver lining to this cloud is a hope that this event will prompt a serious debate on the merits of open source vs. closed source software. O'Reilly is leading the charge with good articles on the merits of open source software. Also, people must finally recognize that open source software is not inherently more vulnerable because anyone can review it. With this Microsoft source disclosure, the world has to acknowledge that Microsoft's code has been available to the underground and is just as easily reviewed as OSS.

On related Microsoft news, today I received Introducing Microsoft Windows Server 2003 in the mail. This was sent after I participated in a phone survey last week on Microsoft's Get The Facts program. I signed up to get a free evaluation copy of Windows 2003 Server, so Microsoft called me. I repeatedly told the survey taker I was concerned with Microsoft's security problems. She was reading a script and tried to pigeon-hole my answers into her form. She tried to steer me towards "server consolidation" and "upgrading from Windows NT 4.0" when I told her I was more interested in "upgrading" to 2003 for security reasons. I told her I ran multiple versions of UNIX and had no plans to change.

Update: This post to full-disclosure claims to be the first public vulnerability discovered as a result of scrutinizing the Windows source code.

Popular posts from this blog

Zeek in Action Videos

Image
This is a quick note to point blog readers to my Zeek in Action YouTube video series for the Zeek network security monitoring project .  Each video addresses a topic that I think might be of interest to people trying to understand their network using Zeek and adjacent tools and approaches, like Suricata, Wireshark, and so on.  I am especially pleased with Video 6 on monitoring wireless networks . It took me several weeks to research material for this video. I had to buy new hardware and experiment with a Linux distro that I had not used before -- Parrot .  Please like and subscribe, and let me know if there is a topic you think might make a good video.
Read more

MITRE ATT&CK Tactics Are Not Tactics

Image
Just what are "tactics"? Introduction MITRE ATT&CK  is a great resource, but something about it has bothered me since I first heard about it several years ago. It's a minor point, but I wanted to document it in case it confuses anyone else. The MITRE ATT&CK Design and Philosophy document from March 2020 says the following: At a high-level, ATT&CK is a behavioral model that consists of the following core components: • Tactics, denoting short-term, tactical adversary goals during an attack; • Techniques, describing the means by which adversaries achieve tactical goals; • Sub-techniques, describing more specific means by which adversaries achieve tactical goals at a lower level than techniques; and • Documented adversary usage of techniques, their procedures, and other metadata. My concern is with MITRE's definition of "tactics" as "short-term, tactical adversary goals during an attack," which is oddly recursive. The key word in the tacti
Read more

New Book! The Best of TaoSecurity Blog, Volume 4

Image
  I've completed the TaoSecurity Blog book series . The new book is  The Best of TaoSecurity Blog, Volume 4: Beyond the Blog with Articles, Testimony, and Scholarship .  It's available now for Kindle , and I'm working on the print edition.  I'm running a 50% off promo on Volumes 1-3 on Kindle through midnight 20 April. Take advantage before the prices go back up. I described the new title thus: Go beyond TaoSecurity Blog with this new volume from author Richard Bejtlich. In the first three volumes of the series, Mr. Bejtlich selected and republished the very best entries from 18 years of writing and over 18 million blog views, along with commentaries and additional material.  In this title, Mr. Bejtlich collects material that has not been published elsewhere, including articles that are no longer available or are stored in assorted digital or physical archives. Volume 4 offers early white papers that Mr. Bejtlich wrote as a network defender, either for technical or pol
Read more