Bejtlich's Take on RSA 2012
This year I spoke at the Executive Security Action Forum on a panel moderated by PayPal CISO Michael Barrett alongside iDefense GM Rick Howard and Lockheed Martin CISO Chandra McMahon. I thought our panel offered value to the audience, as did much of the remainder of the event.
Most of the speakers and attendees (about 100 people) appeared to have accepted the message that prevention eventually fails and that modern security is more like a counterintelligence operation than an IT operation.
After ESAF (all day Monday) I divided my time among the following: speaking to visitors to the Mandiant booth, discussing security issues with reporters and industry analysts, and walking the RSA exposition floor. I also attended the Wednesday panel where one of our VPs, Grady Summers, explained how to deal with hacktivists.
Speaking of the RSA floor, I took the photo at left praising the 55 new vendors appearing at the exposition for the first time. I counted 13 I recognized as "established" companies or organizations (Airwatch, CyberMaryland, Diebold, FireHost, Fluke Networks, Global Knowledge, GoDaddy.com, Good Technology, Nexcom, PhishMe, Prolexic Technologies, Qosmos, and West Coast Labs). I didn't recognize the other 42. There were probably dozens more who were not first-time RSA vendors that I wouldn't recognize either.
I suppose there are different ways to think about this situation. A positive way would be to view these new companies as signs of innovation. However, I didn't really see much that struck me as new or innovative. For example, a company specializing in password resets doesn't really get the heart pumping.
Another point of view could be that the presence of so many new companies means venture capital is active again. I saw plenty of that at work for certain companies who I know have just rebranded, relaunched, or have been resuscitated in recent months. Several of them sported mammoth booths and plenty else. They must figure that if they have 7 or 8 figures to spend, they're going to put it into marketing!
I was in some ways overwhelmed by the number of attendees. I saw references to over 20,000 people attending RSA 2012. I believe many of them wore $100 (or even free, courtesy of vendors) "expo only" passes. With 20,000 people willing to participate in a security event, that tells me my @taosecurity Twitter follower count (over 11,000 today) has more room to grow. I would not have expected to rise much beyond 10,000 when I started Tweeting.
One of the best aspects of RSA 2012 was the Security Bloggers Meetup, which I was able to attend in person as I blogged previously.
My buzzphrase of the conference was "big data." To me, "big data" sounds like SIEM warmed over. I'll have more to say on this topic in future posts.
I'll probably return to RSA next year on behalf of my company, and again I will focus on the exposition and non-session activities. It's the only place where you can see so many security vendors in one place.
What did you think of RSA this year?
Comments
Now, how do we get the rest of the community that needs to accept the message to do so?
I attended for two days this year (should have been more but my schedule was inflexible to say the least) and what I have found over the past 3 RSA's, the real meat is in the side talks, the conferences themselves, seeing people you havent seen in person since last year, and this year, BSidesSF. The Expo itself was filled with lots of firms trying their best to sell their wares (nothing wrong with that) but nothing on the Expo floor itself was earth shattering, or extremely new. Also lots of "Me Too" awards from unnamed publications (seemed like everyone had one)
That being said, 20,000 attendees and the number of companies on the Expo floor, in of itself, is exciting. The interest level is certainly up. I am interested to see how Networld/Interop will be this year in May.