Inputs vs Outputs, or Why Controls Are Not Sufficient
I have a feeling my post Consensus Audit Guidelines Are Still Controls is not going to be popular in certain circles. While tidying the house this evening I came across my 2007 edition of the Economist's Pocket World in Figures. Flipping through the pages I found many examples of inputs (think "control-compliant") vs outputs (think "field-assessed").
I'd like to share some of them with you in an attempt to better communicate the ideas my last post.
Is this making sense?
Richard Bejtlich is teaching new classes in Europe in 2009. Register by 1 Mar for the best rates.
I'd like to share some of them with you in an attempt to better communicate the ideas my last post.
- Business creativity and research
- Input(s): Total expenditures on research and development, % of GDP
- Output(s): Number of patents granted (per X people)
- Education
- Input(s): Education spending, % of GDP; school enrolment
- Output(s): Literacy rate
- Life expectancy, health, and related categories
- Input(s): Health spending, % of GDP; population per doctor; number of hospital beds per citizen; (also add in air quality, drinking and smoking rates, etc.)
- Output(s): Death rates; infant mortality; and so on...
- Crime and punishment
- Input(s): Total police per X population
- Output(s): Crime rate
Is this making sense?
Richard Bejtlich is teaching new classes in Europe in 2009. Register by 1 Mar for the best rates.
Comments