Proposed Air Force Cyber Badge

The Air Force published New cyberspace career fields, training paths, badge proposed earlier this month. I found the proposed cyber badge to be interesting. From the story:

The badge features: lightning bolts to signify the cyberspace domain; center bolts taken from the navigator badge and the Air Force Seal to signify cyberspace's worldwide power and reach and its common lineage and history of electronic warfare officers; and orbits to signify cyberspace's space-related mission elements. And, like other specialty badges, it will identify skill (certification) levels. Final approval and specifics of the wear criteria is under review at the air staff.

For comparison I've posted the intelligence badge I used to wear. Wikipedia's Badges of the US Air Force is a nice reference.

The Air Force also published a proposed Cyberspace Training Path for Operators and Specialists.

Since we're talking military cyber operations, a blog reader asked for my opinion of the new story U.S. Army challenges USAF on network warfare. I saw this first hand at a cyber conference recently. The Air Force colonel who will be vice commander of Cyber Command, Tony Buntyn, spoke, followed by an Army colonel, John Blaine, from NetCom. Col Blaine said the Army had been doing cyber operations for years, seemingly in contrast to the "new" Air Force Cyber Command. Of course, my previous history post noted that the Air Force Information Warfare Center was established in 1993, and the AFCERT was created the year earlier. Air Force cyber history is very extensive, especially if you expand to electronic warfare in Vietnam.

Comments

Unknown said…
That badge is going to get caught on uniforms abound. Sharp points never help when you are tying up your dress for the day
12:00 PM
Anonymous said…
I wonder if anyone else noticed this...On the "Cyberspace Training Paths" pdf chart, in the lower right, it says that "developers" will be "primarily officers" who will "design and modify hardware/software packages." In a classic Orwellian policy reversal, the USAF will once again allow officers who have CS degrees to use what they learned in school! For years, it has been death to an officer's career to have been a programmer; most of the former programmers were passed over and mustered out of the service. Programming and other technical work have been seen in recent years as an enlisted Airman's job. Yet now officers will be allowed to become "developers" and "operators". If you apply the pilot paradigm, then we've had it wrong all these years with the prohibition on officers performing technical computer work. Pilots become highly technically proficient, yet they somehow develop enough leadership skills along the way to become senior Air Force leaders. I'm glad to see the USAF come around to the common sense understanding that officers want (and are quite capable) to actually do work, not just push paper. This will result in better networks that are more secure and cost less money. This can only be good for the Air Force; this is long overdue. So the big question remaining is, since cyber warriors will get wings, will Nomex flight suits and leather jackets be a part of the deal like the Space guys got?
7:45 PM
Anonymous said…
NO, space geeks did not get wings and neither are cyber/info ops people. Notice they are both BADGES not rated wings. So, a flightsuit should be worn by those who actually fly and need a fire resistant suit. Space and cyber operators no more need a flightsuit than the guys working behind other computers at Microsoft. Cyber operations have been conducted by other agencies within the government not just the USAF and they do not get special badges or certainly not flightsuits. Space operators should wear ABU or Blues, and Missileers can return to their blue version otherwise every career field will soon be scrambling for a badge that looks more wing-like in order become operators.
12:40 AM
Anonymous said…
But space operators DO wear flight suits and leather jackets. Cyber geeks will be next, then everyone else will want theirs too.
8:50 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Zeek in Action Videos

Image
This is a quick note to point blog readers to my Zeek in Action YouTube video series for the Zeek network security monitoring project .  Each video addresses a topic that I think might be of interest to people trying to understand their network using Zeek and adjacent tools and approaches, like Suricata, Wireshark, and so on.  I am especially pleased with Video 6 on monitoring wireless networks . It took me several weeks to research material for this video. I had to buy new hardware and experiment with a Linux distro that I had not used before -- Parrot .  Please like and subscribe, and let me know if there is a topic you think might make a good video.
Read more

MITRE ATT&CK Tactics Are Not Tactics

Image
Just what are "tactics"? Introduction MITRE ATT&CK  is a great resource, but something about it has bothered me since I first heard about it several years ago. It's a minor point, but I wanted to document it in case it confuses anyone else. The MITRE ATT&CK Design and Philosophy document from March 2020 says the following: At a high-level, ATT&CK is a behavioral model that consists of the following core components: • Tactics, denoting short-term, tactical adversary goals during an attack; • Techniques, describing the means by which adversaries achieve tactical goals; • Sub-techniques, describing more specific means by which adversaries achieve tactical goals at a lower level than techniques; and • Documented adversary usage of techniques, their procedures, and other metadata. My concern is with MITRE's definition of "tactics" as "short-term, tactical adversary goals during an attack," which is oddly recursive. The key word in the tacti
Read more

New Book! The Best of TaoSecurity Blog, Volume 4

Image
  I've completed the TaoSecurity Blog book series . The new book is  The Best of TaoSecurity Blog, Volume 4: Beyond the Blog with Articles, Testimony, and Scholarship .  It's available now for Kindle , and I'm working on the print edition.  I'm running a 50% off promo on Volumes 1-3 on Kindle through midnight 20 April. Take advantage before the prices go back up. I described the new title thus: Go beyond TaoSecurity Blog with this new volume from author Richard Bejtlich. In the first three volumes of the series, Mr. Bejtlich selected and republished the very best entries from 18 years of writing and over 18 million blog views, along with commentaries and additional material.  In this title, Mr. Bejtlich collects material that has not been published elsewhere, including articles that are no longer available or are stored in assorted digital or physical archives. Volume 4 offers early white papers that Mr. Bejtlich wrote as a network defender, either for technical or pol
Read more