tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4088979.post3439205185776967068..comments2023-10-16T06:06:25.012-04:00Comments on TaoSecurity Blog: Cybersecurity and Class M PlanetsRichard Bejtlichhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13512184196416665417noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4088979.post-15175533354807997382018-11-04T09:42:33.858-05:002018-11-04T09:42:33.858-05:00I am a believer in frameworks, standards and best ...I am a believer in frameworks, standards and best practices because it sets a foundation of Security and provides a common language.A "class" of networks would be helpful in extending our language.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13795149078133505610noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4088979.post-54220907158259631352018-11-02T14:59:07.040-04:002018-11-02T14:59:07.040-04:00This could be an interesting concept. Perhaps the ...This could be an interesting concept. Perhaps the trust model could be an additional differentiator here. You've got traditional environments where entire subnets have access to datacenters. Then there are networks where the datacenter and/or the cloud don't trust the office networks, each endpoint and user is authenticated and can only reach a particular service or application. In these environments, the traditional office networks are nothing more than the equivalent of a Starbucks (internet only). Completely changes the security strategy, in a good way, IMO.Joehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14998755598722686389noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4088979.post-77546465907935985742018-11-02T10:19:26.472-04:002018-11-02T10:19:26.472-04:00Very interesting idea.
I gotta say, though: pleas...Very interesting idea.<br /><br />I gotta say, though: please, no Class C networks. I'm working hard to stamp out the very idea of classfull addressing.<br /><br />==mlMichael W Lucashttps://mwl.ionoreply@blogger.com